Sophros SOPHROS
RAT Research Portal

Internal access only. Enter the team password to continue.

Incorrect password — try again.
Rhythmic Auditory Training · Internal Reference

The RAT Protocol,
documented end to end.

A single reference portal for the Sophros data & research team — every training library, every instrumentation, the clinical evidence, the brain systems engaged, and the data-quality trail behind it all.

auditory timing → regulation
The Eight Libraries

Training libraries at a glance

Each library is a purpose-built soundscape targeting a domain of regulation. Click any card to open its instrumentation.

Using this portal

Built for the research team

  • Instrumentation — filter/search all instruments across the six-field template, with data-status flags.
  • Coverage — a sub-domain × library heatmap of coverage, gaps, and overlap.
  • Build a Soundscape — symptom intake → recommended layering recipe.
  • Brain — the interactive map plus a cross-linked region index.
  • Methodology — the data dictionary: fields, naming schema, taxonomy, sorting rules.
  • Status — version, changelog, and the live QC issue tracker.
Global search

Find anything, fast

Use the search box in the top bar to jump to any instrument, sub-domain, brain region, or citation from anywhere in the portal.

Instrumentation Reference

The instrumentation library

Every documented instrumentation across the eight libraries, in Coral's six-field template. Filter, search, and expand any row for the full record and its data-quality status.

Coverage

Sub-domain × library matrix

How many instruments in each library target each sub-domain. A sub-domain's home library is outlined; filled cells outside it reveal cross-library targeting and overlap. Click a cell to open those instruments.

Interactive 3D + region index

Brain Explorer

The library-to-brain map. Below the view, each region links to the libraries and instruments that engage it.

Full screen ↗ Download

Region index

18 regions engaged across the protocol. Click a library pill to open its instrumentation.

EEG · qEEG Correlates

Reading RAT on the brain's own clock

RAT is open-loop auditory entrainment. Because it works through the auditory system — the brain's fastest and most precise timing channel — its effects are electrophysiologically visible at every level, from brainstem phase-locking to cortical steady-state and event-related potentials. This section maps how each soundscape corresponds to an EEG signature, how a qEEG / ERP workup can target a protocol, and how the same measures validate it pre- and post-training.

It is meant to sit alongside closed-loop neurofeedback, not to compete with it. Neurofeedback trains the brain to change its own output through reinforcement; RAT supplies a precisely-timed external drive the brain phase-locks to. qEEG is the instrument that can select the drive and confirm it landed — closing the loop RAT itself leaves open.

The distinction that matters most

Carrier pitch is not brainwave frequency. A 135 Hz tone does not create a 135 Hz cortical rhythm. Neural entrainment rides the amplitude envelope — the modulation rate, beat tempo, and onset periodicity of the sound — not the carrier.

A carrier can sit anywhere in the audible band while its envelope is modulated at, say, ~10 Hz to engage alpha, or delivered at 40 Hz to drive the gamma ASSR. Every correspondence below targets envelope / beat rate and treats carrier frequency as a separate axis (timbre, tissue engagement, comfort).

Where RAT shows up on EEG

Five levels of measurement, ascending the same pathway the protocol is built on:

01

Brainstem · FFR / cABR

The frequency-following response is scalp-recorded phase-locking to the sound's periodicity and envelope. Auditory training improves neural timing in the brainstem (Kraus and colleagues) — the direct electrophysiological substrate of RAT's founding premise.

02

Cortical steady-state · ASSR

A sound amplitude-modulated at a fixed rate drives a scalp response at that rate. The 40 Hz ASSR indexes gamma-band excitation/inhibition balance and is reduced in schizophrenia (robustly), autism, and bipolar disorder.

03

Preattentive gating · P50, MMN, N100

How the auditory system filters redundancy (P50 paired-click suppression) and flags deviance (mismatch negativity) before attention engages. Impaired gating shows up in PTSD and schizophrenia; MMN indexes discrimination.

04

Attentional allocation · P300

The P300 tracks how resources are allocated to salient events. Rhythmic auditory stimulation has been shown to improve P300 measures in Parkinson's disease.

05

Resting qEEG

Band power (delta→gamma), ratios, peak alpha frequency, frontal asymmetry, and coherence — the trait-level map a brain-mapping workup produces, and the baseline RAT is measured against.

Interactive 3D · EEG

EEG Explorer

The same brain model as the Brain tab, re-mapped to electrophysiology. Toggle between biomarkers and frequency bands, click a signature to light its cortical generators, click any region for its EEG signature, and switch on the 10-20 electrode montage to see where each marker is recorded.

Full screen ↗ Download
Biomarker → Soundscape

Matching each signature to a library

Every row is calibrated. Established = well-replicated in the literature. Emerging = the marker is established but RAT's effect on it is early-stage. Rationale = a mechanistic prediction extending a known effect, not an outcome claim.

EEG markerWhat it indexesCommon dysregulationRAT correspondence · envelope / beat targetEvidence
FFR / cABR
brainstem phase-locking
Temporal precision of sound encodingJittered / degraded timing in language, reading and auditory-processing difficultyL1 L4 Steady low-frequency envelope; sub-bass carrier — strengthen the following responseEstablished
40 Hz ASSR
gamma band
Cortical E/I balance, sensory bindingReduced amplitude / delayed phase in ASD, schizophrenia, bipolarL2 Envelope modulation toward the gamma range; sensory-integration soundscapeMarker Established · RAT effect Emerging
P50 gating
paired-click suppression
Filtering of redundant inputImpaired suppression in PTSD, schizophrenia (mixed in ASD)L2 L5 Predictable, low-novelty field lowers the gating loadMarker Established · RAT effect Rationale
MMN
mismatch negativity
Preattentive auditory discriminationReduced in schizophrenia; atypical in ASD and dyslexiaL2 L6 Structured deviance within voice-range / social soundscapesMarker Established
P300
P3b
Attentional & working-memory allocationReduced amplitude / delayed latency in ADHD and Parkinson'sL3 Beat-based attentional scaffolding; cognitive-timing soundscapeEstablished · RAS→P300 supported in PD
Theta/beta ratio
TBR
Cortical arousal / inattentionHistorically elevated in an ADHD subgroupL3 Arousal-lifting, beat-anchored attention soundscapeFDA-cleared adjunct, but not a reliable standalone diagnostic (Arns et al., 2013)
Peak alpha frequency
PAF / IAF
Processing speed, arousal set-pointSlower PAF in cognitive slowing and schizophreniaL3 L7 Support arousal / alertnessPutative marker · standalone value debated
Frontal alpha asymmetry
FAA
Approach / withdrawal, mood valenceLeftward hypoactivation linked to depression vulnerability (Davidson)L5 L7 Mood- and arousal-oriented soundscapesSmall effect · limited standalone diagnostic value (meta-analysis, 2025)
High-beta excess
~20–30 Hz
Hyperarousal, vigilanceElevated in anxiety and PTSD hypervigilanceL5 L7 Parasympathetic-leaning low-frequency foundationRationale / Emerging
Frontal slow-wave
delta / theta
Under-arousal, dysregulationFrontal slowing in TBI and regulatory disordersL1 Autonomic down-regulation via the settle phaseRationale

Library key — L1 Nervous System Regulation · L2 Sensory Processing · L3 Attention · L4 Motor Control · L5 Behavioral Regulation · L6 Social Engagement · L7 Arousal & Stress · L8 Body Awareness

Building a protocol from a brain map

A qEEG-guided RAT protocol runs the same arc a clinician already knows — assess, target, deliver, re-assess — with the soundscape as the intervention:

01

Baseline map

Resting qEEG plus a targeted ERP / ASSR panel produces the individual's electrophysiological profile.

02

Identify markers

Flag the dysregulated signatures — e.g. blunted 40 Hz ASSR, impaired P50 gating, elevated high-beta, slow peak alpha.

03

Map to a library

Each marker points to the soundscape whose mechanism addresses it, using the table above.

04

Set envelope parameters

Choose modulation / beat rate and tempo to the targeted band. Carrier, timbre and spatialization are set separately for comfort and tissue engagement.

05

Deliver & re-test

Repeat the panel to quantify change — the objective outcome. qEEG closes the loop that open-loop stimulation leaves open.

Band ↔ envelope reference

BandRangeState / functionEnvelope · beat correspondenceLibraries
Delta0.5–4 HzDeep rest, down-regulationVery slow envelopes; settle phaseL1
Theta4–8 HzDrowsy, memory, trauma processingSlow beat; meditative tempoL1, L7
Alpha8–12 HzRelaxed wakefulness~8–12 Hz envelope; relaxed tempoL3, L7
SMR12–15 HzCalm focus, motor stillnessSteady mid-tempo beatL3, L4
Beta15–30 HzActive cognition (excess → anxiety)Brisker beat; down-regulate for hyperarousalL3 · down-regulate L5, L7
Gamma~40 HzBinding, sensory integration40 Hz amplitude modulation (ASSR)L2

Read this as correspondence, not conversion. These are envelope / beat targets and mechanistic rationales — not a claim that passive listening reliably shifts a fixed resting-band power in every individual.

A note on evidence & posture

Several of these markers have been over-sold historically and later qualified — theta/beta ratio, frontal alpha asymmetry, and peak alpha frequency all have documented limits as standalone diagnostics. We treat them as elements of a profile, not single-number verdicts, and we distinguish an established marker from an established RAT effect on that marker. That separation is deliberate: it is what makes the correspondences above defensible in front of someone who reads this literature for a living.

Glossary

qEEGQuantitative EEG — normed, statistical brain mapping of band power, ratios, asymmetry and connectivity.
ASSRAuditory steady-state response — scalp response entrained to a fixed sound-modulation rate; 40 Hz variant indexes gamma / E-I balance.
FFR / cABRFrequency-following / complex auditory brainstem response — subcortical phase-locking to a sound's periodicity; a timing-precision readout.
P50 gatingPaired-click suppression — how well the brain dampens its response to a repeated, redundant stimulus.
MMNMismatch negativity — preattentive response (~100–250 ms) to an auditory deviation from a regular pattern.
P300Positive deflection (~300 ms) reflecting attentional and working-memory allocation to a salient event.
PAF / IAFPeak / individual alpha frequency — the dominant alpha rhythm; a putative index of processing speed and arousal.
FAAFrontal alpha asymmetry — left/right frontal alpha balance, linked to approach/withdrawal and mood.
Open- vs closed-loopRAT is open-loop (external timed drive the brain phase-locks to); neurofeedback is closed-loop (the brain's own output reinforced back to it). qEEG can target and validate both.

Key references

Kraus & Chandrasekaran (2010), Nat. Rev. Neurosci. — auditory training & brainstem timing · Picton et al. (2003), Int. J. Audiol. — human ASSR · Thuné, Recasens & Uhlhaas (2016), JAMA Psychiatry, and subsequent meta-analyses — 40 Hz ASSR in schizophrenia/ASD · Näätänen et al. — MMN · Polich (2007), Clin. Neurophysiol. — "Updating P300" · Monastra et al. (1999) & Arns, Conners & Kraemer (2013), J. Atten. Disord. — theta/beta ratio · Klimesch (1999), Brain Res. Rev. — alpha/theta & cognition · Davidson — frontal EEG asymmetry · Grahn & Brett (2007), J. Cogn. Neurosci. — beat perception in motor areas · rhythmic-auditory-stimulation gait meta-analysis (2017), Sci. Rep. Full, tagged list on the References tab.

Clinical Relevance

Why rhythmic auditory training works

RAT is built on a single premise: the auditory system is the brain's fastest and most precise timing instrument. Vision is comparatively sluggish and tactile input is moderate; only the auditory pathway delivers temporal information at the resolution the nervous system needs for regulation, attention scaffolding, and motor entrainment. Every library in the protocol is an application of that fact.

Jump to a soundscape

Open any library's full instrumentation and protocol envelope:

Four mechanisms doing the work

01

Rhythmic entrainment

A periodic beat elicits a sustained, frequency-locked cortical response — the nervous system doesn't merely hear a pulse, it resonates at it. Cardiovascular and respiratory variables track musical tempo directly.

02

Predictive processing

A repeating, transient-free field drives auditory prediction error toward zero. The reduction of acoustic uncertainty is what the threat-detection system reads as safety — regulation before thought.

03

Vestibular / otolith engagement

Low-frequency sound directly stimulates the otolith organs, tuned to sub-100 Hz vibration below auditory threshold. Sub-bass is felt by the body — the most reliable somatic tether for a dissociated client.

04

Limbic & vagal activation

Warm, human-sourced timbre maps onto limbic circuitry, and low-frequency content entrains brainstem and autonomic activity toward parasympathetic dominance.

The low-frequency foundation

Sub-250 Hz content appears in every library. Lower frequencies prime and regulate before any other element does training work — the shared floor the protocol is built on.

Acute vs. tonic regulation

Library 1 is acute and state-based — discrete episodes needing in-the-moment de-escalation (fast rescue, 60–80 BPM). Library 7 is tonic and trait-based — the persistent resting set-point retrained slowly (50–65 BPM, measured by cortisol/GAD-7/PSQI). A symptom belongs to whichever library's soundscape actually treats it.

Clinical targets by library

A note on the evidence

Every citation is real and verifiable. Where a predicted effect extends an established mechanism into a new application, that is framed as a mechanistic rationale, not an outcome claim. See References for the full list, tagged by evidence type.

From intake to soundscape

Build a Soundscape

Select the sub-domains present in the client's intake. The tool maps them to the libraries whose soundscapes treat them and assembles a recommended layering recipe from the documented instrumentation.

1 · Presenting sub-domains

2 · Recommended soundscape

Data Dictionary & Methodology

How this dataset is built

This page codifies the rules the reference set follows, so the data is auditable and any team member can extend it consistently.

The six fields (Coral's template)

FieldDefinition
InstrumentationThe categorical musical element / folder that houses the individual audio files.
Label / sThe audio files inside the folder, with the filename schema.
DefinitionWhat the musical element is, in plain music-theory terms.
Target Symptom / Predicted EffectSub-domains targeted + predicted effect + the mechanistic reason (WHY) the element has that effect.
Auditory VariablesFrequency, BPM, spatial placement, key, beat structure.
Variances(a) how it varies within the library; (b) how/why it varies with symptom severity.

File-naming schema

Libraries 1–6 use [Library].[Code].[Variation].[BPM].wav, where the second number is the instrument index (e.g. 3.2.XYLO.100.wav). Libraries 7–8 as recorded use a dotted key/BPM scheme (7.KICK.60.wav, 8.1.SPACEHARP.EM.70.wav). Known inconsistency: in L8, 8.1/8.2/8.3 is used as a variation index that restarts per folder — tracked as QC-01 on the Status page.

Sub-domain taxonomy (the D&R list)

Each library owns a fixed set of neutral, non-diagnostic sub-domains (shown on the Coverage matrix and each library's envelope). Diagnostic labels (ADHD, PTSD, etc.) are deliberately avoided in the taxonomy in favor of symptom-level descriptors. An instrument may target a sub-domain owned by another library — those cross-links are what the coverage matrix surfaces.

Acute vs. tonic sorting rule (L1 vs L7)

A symptom is filed to whichever library's soundscape actually treats it. Acute / phasic / state-based presentations (discrete episodes, in-the-moment de-escalation, post-event recovery) → Library 1. Tonic / trait-based presentations (persistent resting set-point, chronic-stress physiology, retrained over days) → Library 7. This maps onto the clinical phasic-vs-tonic arousal distinction.

Low-frequency foundation

Sub-250 Hz content is intentional across all libraries, including those whose stated range sits higher — it is not an inconsistency. Lower always helps priming and regulation, so library Hz "floors" are not enforced.

Evidence standard

Every citation is real and DOI-verifiable; no fabricated sources. Claims are written confidently but a predicted effect that extends a mechanism is framed as rationale, not an outcome. References are tagged Mechanism / Clinical / Framework on the References page.

Source Files

Downloads

The underlying deliverables — the source of truth the portal is generated from. Each is also rendered live below, no download needed.

Viewing here

Open on the page

XLSXInstrumentation Spreadsheetlive · all instruments
DOCXInstrumentation Reference (document)live · six-field records
HTMLBrain Explorerlive · interactive 3D
DOCXLibraries 7 & 8 — Recording Speclive · studio guide
Evidence Base

References

All peer-reviewed sources, tagged by evidence type and linked to their DOI where available. Each lists the instruments that cite it. Export the full set for a reference manager.

Project Status

Version, changelog & data quality

Changelog

QC issue tracker

Client Intake

Soundscape Prescription

Choose the population, then upload a completed RAT Soundscape Survey (.xlsx). The portal scores the 80 items, ranks the eight libraries, charts the profile, and produces an engineer-facing prescription with the survey-based reasoning behind every parameter. Each submission is saved to the History log.

Download blank form ↓
Competitive & Scientific Landscape

Industry Land

Who else is working in our space worldwide — academic centres, companies, funders, professional bodies — what they have that we don't, and where the open ground is. Every entry links to a verifiable source.

Training Academy

Learn Sophros

Short courses, quizzes and games that teach how Rhythmic Auditory Training works — from the premise, through the eight libraries and the brain pathways, to reading a prescription and building a session. Progress is saved in this browser.